Bankia particulares consultar saldo
Bankia app español
With the invaluable help of hindsight, it can be deduced that it would have been preferable to «abort» Bankia’s IPO, in view of the adverse circumstances. And it is clear that Bankia’s commercial network, faced with the scarcity of institutional investors, actively recommended to its clients the purchase of shares, which -following the jurisprudence that the Supreme Court itself has established in its numerous rulings on swaps- would have required the application of suitability and appropriateness tests to the clients, The absence of which allows for the presumption of error in consent (the 1st Chamber of the Supreme Court should have used this criterion to annul the placement of Bankia shares to individuals, instead of the erroneous and unnecessary criterion of the «accounting misrepresentations» in the IPO prospectus).
I have no personal, family or professional ties with Rato or any other defendant and, moreover, I am glad that some of them are already in jail for the genuine crimes they committed (such as the black cards and perhaps others). Why am I defending them with respect to the Bankia IPO?
Bankia companies
Collective dinner with the lawyer of the case, for individuals or groups that can contribute that amount, where they can talk to him about economic crimes and especially about the case + Coupon for an individual legal consultation + Newsletter + Tuned digital photo of justice + Web recognition (except anonymous contributions)
Contributions from 2,017 euros can also be decisive among those who can afford it, either personally, collectively or anonymously. In addition to the rewards written here we can’t think of anything else, but if you think you can contribute more, welcome. Every euro will be invested in achieving the objectives described.
In the 3 months that have passed since we started 15MPaRato, we have advanced in our task of attacking those directly responsible for the crisis, which we concretized in the objective of imprisoning Rato and other directors of Bankia as a symbol of the financial swindle.
The attempt to deactivate the resistance of the citizenry to let themselves be robbed with impunity in order to compensate instead the big investors of the Troika has materialized with a new law ordered by Brussels, the Royal Decree of August 31. (Royal Decree-Law 24/2012).
Bankia english customer service
Its parent company is BFA Tenedora de Acciones, created in 2015, following the transformation of Banco Financiero y de Ahorros (BFA) into this new holding company, as a consequence of the loss of its status as a credit institution.[4] Bankia was originally planned to be just the commercial brand under which Banco Financiero y de Ahorros (BFA) would operate, an Institutional Protection System (SIP) (also known as SIP).
Initially, it was planned that Bankia would be just the commercial brand under which Banco Financiero y de Ahorros (BFA), an Institutional Protection System (SIP) (also known as cold merger) emerged in 2010 from the merger of the banking businesses of seven savings banks (Caja Madrid, Bancaja, La Caja de Canarias, Caja de Ávila, Caixa Laietana, Caja Segovia and Caja Rioja) but mainly participated, at the beginning, by the first two. [6] This operation gave rise to an entity that would jointly manage some 340,000 million euros of assets and which received a loan from the FROB for 4,465 million. 7] A series of changes in the financial situation of the entity and the country would finally lead to Bankia being constituted as an independent company, a subsidiary of BFA, and not as a commercial brand.
Bankia customer service
Specialist in distribution, commerce, industry, lobbies, companies, pharmaceuticals, real estate, telecommunications, innovation, logistics, infrastructure, consumption, transport, energy, sustainability…
That is why the National Commission for Markets and Competition (CNMC), he said, «will take the necessary measures» in each case to ensure «that the financial sector fulfills in the future the role that corresponds to it».
On the other hand, IEB professor, Juan Abellán, considers that the operation «makes sense for both parties». In statements to EFE, he assured that in Bankia, the State had «an uncomfortable position in front of the ECB» that was demanding it to reduce the 61% that the entity had. «Now it would be left with 14-15% in the new entity and that would allow it to delay the sale and get rid of that stake».
The consumer protection association Asufin said Friday that the merger between Bankia and CaixaBank is a major movement of banking concentration that is worrying and limits competition. In Asufin’s opinion, this type of operation generates entities that are too big to fail, and also represents a risk for the consumer.
Relacionados
Bienvenid@ a mi blog, soy Octavio Pérez Alonso y te ofrezco noticias de actualidad.
Comments are closed